Ljubljana

Who is Online

Details: Written by: Richard_McKie; Parent Category: Travel; Category: Europe; Published: 27 January 2020; Hits: 23752

Article Index

Page 12 of 15

Since 1992, when the Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia fell apart, Ljubljana has been the capital of the independent State of Slovenia. Prior to the creation of Yugoslavia, in 1918, Slovenia was part of the Austro-Hungarian (Habsburg) Empire that met its demise with its defeat in World War 1. This heritage is still evident in the architecture.

Economically, Slovenia is now one of the best performing remnants of the former Yugoslavia. It's been part of the Euro Zone since 2007 and has an unemployment rate close to the European Union average.

As we had the car, we booked in at a B&B that's really a motel, with breakfast included, and a convenient adjacent supermarket. Although there was public transport, it turned out to be more convenient to drive in to a park on the edge of the city, with a free car-park, and to walk in. This gave us an opportunity both to: get lost in the one-way system, while driving; and to see quite a bit of the city that's not on the usual tourist agenda, while walking.

Ljubljana pedestrian zone and the Ljubljana River

Another day another castle - Ljubljana Castle that stands above the city is reached by a funicular railway - you know 'feniculi-funicular' - about the seductive potential of these newfangled inclinators:

No responsibility is accepted for linked third party video or media content - see Terms of Use and Copyright.
You follow any YouTube links or advertisements displayed at your own risk.

Ljubljana Castle

It has a great double-helix stair system to the tower - one helix up and the other down. But no sitting on the walls even though it's a shorter fall than at Bled.

In the Castle there's a museum that actually harks back to Yugoslavia
In most other museums this period is a blank
This is a bust of Tito and an example - there were several including small arms - of a manufactured item

Josip Broz Tito - otherwise known as President Tito of Yugoslavia - led the Yugoslav (Communist) Partisans during WW2 against the Axis Powers and then post-war Yugoslavia. This is the only image of him we've seen on this trip.

In his time Yugoslavia apparently manufactured cool motorbikes and smallarms, among other things on display here. Once he died it all began to fall apart. By 1992 the Balkans were balkanised once more. Did anyone say BREXIT?

Of course, Tito never knew. He died confident that Yugoslavia would continue as a united commonwealth into the distant future.

The National Gallery of Slovenia (Narodna Galerija) was also worth a visit.

The National Gallery of Slovenia (Narodna Galerija)
At the bottom is a 'Crystal Reliquary of St John the Baptist's Blood'

Among the Gallery's collection is a 'Crystal Reliquary of St John the Baptist's Blood' from the early 13th century. Presumably Salome saved a pint or two for posterity.

The wide scale practice of manufacturing reliquaries, to attract pilgrims, was one of the things that so incensed the Protestants in the 16th century. After the Reformation, the Roman Church largely abandoned the practice but there are many we've seen that are still actively revered. Many are beautifully crafted in precious metals and jewels and often contain body parts. The gallery has some particularly beautiful examples. They now attract tourists.

No comments

Travel

Israel

2024 Addendum

It's shocking that another Addendum to this article is necessary.

Yet, we are no nearer to a peaceful resolution like the, internationally called for, 'Two state solution', or some workable version thereof.

Indeed, the situation, particularly for Palestinians, has gone from bad to worse.

At the same time, Israeli losses are mounting as the war drags on. Yet, Hamas remains undefeated and Bibi remains recalcitrant.

Comments:

On Wed, 4 Sep 2024, at 1:23 PM, Barry Cross wrote:
> There seems to be no resolution to the problem of the disputed land of Israel. You consider Gaza to have been put under siege, but I wonder if that and the other Israeli acts you mention are themselves responses to a response by them of being under siege, or at least being seriously threatened, by hostile forces who do not recognise the legitimacy of the state of Israel? Hamas’s claim and stated intention of establishing a Palestinian state “from the river to the sea” and periodic acts of aggression need to be taken into account I suggest, when judging the actions of the Israeli’s. In addition, there is the menace coming from Iranian proxies in Southern Lebanon and Yemen, and from Iran itself.
>
> Whatever the merits of the respective claims to the contended territory might be, it seems reasonable to accept that Israeli’s to consider they are a constant threat to their very survival. Naturally, this must influence their actions, particularly in response to the many acts of aggression they have been subjected to over many decades. By way of contrast, how lucky are we!
>
> These are my off the cuff comments for what they are worth.
>
> Regards
> Barry Cross
>
> Sent from my iPhone

2023 Addendum

It's a decade since this visit to Israel in September 2014.

From July until just a month before we arrived, Israeli troops had been conducting an 'operation' against Hamas in the Gaza strip, in the course of which 469 Israeli soldiers lost their lives. The country was still reeling.

17,200 Garzan homes were totally destroyed and three times that number were seriously damaged. An estimated 2,000 (who keeps count) civilians died in the destruction. 'Bibi' Netanyahu, who had ordered the Operation, declared it a victory.

This time it's on a grander scale: a 'War', and Bibi has vowed to wipe-out Hamas.

Pundits have been moved to speculate on the Hamas strategy, that was obviously premeditated. In addition to taking hostages, it involving sickening brutality against obvious innocents, with many of the worst images made and published by themselves.

It seemed to be deliberate provocation, with a highly predictable outcome.

Martyrdom?

Historically, Hamas have done Bibi no harm. See: 'For years, Netanyahu propped up Hamas. Now it’s blown up in our faces' in the Israel Times.

Thinking about our visit, I've been moved to wonder how many of today's terrorists were children a decade ago? How many saw their loved ones: buried alive; blown apart; maimed for life; then dismissed by Bibi as: 'collateral damage'?

And how many of the children, now stumbling in the rubble, will, in their turn, become terrorists against the hated oppressor across the barrier?

Is Bibi's present purge a good strategy for assuring future harmony?

I commend my decade old analysis to you: A Brief Modern History and Is there a solution?

Comments:
Since posting the above I've been sent the following article, implicating religious belief, with which I substantially agree, save for its disregarding the Jewish fundamentalists'/extremists' complicity; amplifying the present horrors: The Bright Line Between Good and Evil

Another reader has provided a link to a perspective similar to my own by Australian 'Elder Statesman' John Menadue: Hamas, Gaza and the continuing Zionist project. His Pearls and Irritations site provides a number of articles relating to the current Gaza situation. Worth a read.

The Economist has since reported and unusual spate of short-selling immediately preceding the attacks: Who made millions trading the October 7th attacks?

Money-making by someone in the know? If so, it's beyond evil.

A Little Background

The land between the Jordan river and the Mediterranean Sea, known as Palestine, is one of the most fought over in human history. Anthropologists believe that the first humans to leave Africa lived in and around this region and that all non-African humans are related to these common ancestors who lived perhaps 70,000 years ago. At first glance this interest seems odd, because as bits of territory go it's nothing special. These days it's mostly desert and semi-desert. Somewhere back-o-Bourke might look similar, if a bit redder.

Yet since humans have kept written records, Egyptians, Canaanites, Philistines, Ancient Israelites, Assyrians, Babylonians, Persians, Greeks, Romans, Byzantines, early Muslims, Christian Crusaders, Ottomans (and other later Muslims), British and Zionists, have all fought to control this land. This has sometimes been for strategic reasons alone but often partly for affairs of the heart, because this land is steeped in history and myth.

Fiction, Recollections & News

The Royal Wedding

It often surprises our international interlocutors, for example in Romania, Russia or Germany, that Australia is a monarchy. More surprisingly, that our Monarch is not the privileged descendent of an early Australian squatter or more typically a medieval warlord but Queen Elizabeth of Great Britain and Northern Island - who I suppose could qualify as the latter.

Thus unlike those ex-colonial Americans, British Royal weddings are not just about celebrity. To Australians, Canadians and New Zealanders, in addition to several smaller Commonwealth countries, they have a bearing our shared Monarchy.

Yet in Australia, except for occasional visits and the endorsement of our choice of viceroys, matters royal are mainly the preoccupation of the readers of women's magazines.

That women's magazines enjoy almost exclusive monopoly of this element of the National culture is rather strange in these days of gender equality. There's nary a mention in the men's magazines. Scan them as I might at the barber's or when browsing a newsstand - few protagonists who are not engaged in sport; modifying equipment or buildings; or exposing their breasts; get a look in.

But a Royal wedding hypes things up, so there is collateral involvement. Husbands and partners are drawn in.

Opinions and Philosophy

Manufacturing in Australia

This article was written in August 2011 after a career of many years concerned with Business Development in New South Wales Australia. I've not replaced it because, while the detailed economic parameters have changed, the underlying economic arguments remain the same (and it was a lot of work that I don't wish to repeat) for example:

between Oct 2010 and April 2013 the Australian dollar exceeded the value of the US dollar and that was seriously impacting local manufacturing, particularly exporters;
as a result, in November 2011, the RBA (Reserve Bank of Australia) reduced the cash rate (%) from 4.75 to 4.5 and a month later to 4.25; yet
the dollar stayed stubbornly high until 2015, mainly due to a favourable balance of trade in commodities and to Australia's attraction to foreign investors following the Global Financial Crisis, that Australia had largely avoided.

2011 introduction:

Manufacturing viability is back in the news.

The loss of manufacturing jobs in the steel industry has been a rallying point for unions and employers' groups. The trigger was the announcement of the closure of the No 6 blast furnace at the BlueScope plant at Port Kembla. This furnace is well into its present campaign and would have eventually required a very costly reline to keep operating. The company says the loss of export sales does not justify its continued operation. The remaining No 5 blast furnace underwent a major reline in 2009. The immediate impact of the closure will be a halving of iron production; and correspondingly of downstream steel manufacture. BlueScope will also close the aging strip-rolling facility at Western Port in Victoria, originally designed to meet the automotive demand in Victoria and South Australia.

800 jobs will go at Port Kembla, 200 at Western Port and another 400 from local contractors. The other Australian steelmaker OneSteel has also recently announced a workforce reduction of 400 jobs.

This announcement has reignited the 20th Century free trade versus protectionist economic and political debate. Labor backbenchers and the Greens want a Parliamentary enquiry. The Prime Minister (Julia Gillard) reportedly initially agreed, then, perhaps smelling trouble, demurred. No doubt 'Sir Humphrey' lurks not far back in the shadows.

So what has and hasn't changed (disregarding a world pandemic presently raging)?

Terms of Use

Terms of Use Copyright